• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

(256) 536-0770   •   (800) 804-2502

info@law-injury.com

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Siniard Timberlake & League

Siniard, Timberlake & League

  • Practice Areas
    • Automobile Wrecks
    • Construction Accidents
    • Insurance Disputes
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Personal Injury
    • Product Defects
    • Slip & Falls
    • Work Related Accidents
    • Wrongful Death
  • Blog
  • FAQs
    • Video FAQs
      • Lawyer FAQ Videos
      • Personal Injury FAQ Videos
      • About Siniard, Timberlake, and League Videos
      • Legal Terms Explained Videos
      • Lawsuit Question Videos
      • LawCall with WAAY 31
  • About Us
    • Meet Our Team
    • Our Process
    • Why Us
  • Our Location
  • Newsletter
Contact Us

Premises Liability Claims in Alabama

September 9, 2019 by Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C.

Premises Liability Claims in Alabama

If you suffer an injury on property owned by another person or business in Alabama, it is important to understand the various laws and rules that will determine whether the owner is legally responsible for your injury. 

It is critical to realize that a property owner is not automatically responsible to pay compensation for an injury simply because it occurred on their property. 

Premises Liability Claims in Alabama

In order for an owner to be responsible, an injured party must prove that the owner was at fault in some way for the injury. There must be evidence that the owner created the hazard or allowed a hazard or defective condition to remain on their property to establish a claim. In most cases, it is necessary to prove that the owner knew or should have known about the hazard and failed to repair the condition or warn persons of the danger it presented.   

Property owners in Alabama have different responsibilities – referred to as a “legal duty” – to persons present on their property based on the reason the visitor is on the property. If a person is invited on to property for a business purpose or for a purpose that provides a “benefit” to the landowner, he or she will be legally classified as an “invitee.” A landowner owes the highest duty to an invitee since they are visiting the property for the benefit of the owner. 

With regard to invitees, a landowner has a duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe manner. This means that the owner must perform inspections of the property to identify hazards and defects, and fix any such problems or provide an appropriate warning – such as a wet floor sign – to prevent visitors from suffering an injury.  A landowner will be responsible for injuries to an invitee if the owner had actual knowledge of the hazard or defective condition, or if they should have known about the condition.

Landowners have less responsibility or duty to persons on their property that are not present for a purpose that “benefits” the landowner.  Social guests or friends who are not present on the property for a business purpose are legally referred to as “licensees.” A landowner’s responsibility to a social guest or licensee is to warn of defective conditions or hazards that are known exist on the property. Landowners must warn social guests of unique or particular hazards – such as unusually steep stairs and uneven or slippery floors – that the landowner is aware of and that presents a risk of injury to their guests.

Uninvited guests or trespassers will only be able to pursue claims if a landowner recklessly, willfully, or intentionally does something to cause an injury. A landowner will be responsible for an injury to a trespasser if they set a trap or intentionally create a hazard with the expectation that a trespasser will come on to their property.

There are several available defenses that landowners may use to respond to a claim of a person injured on their property. If a defect or a hazard is “open and obvious,” a landowner may not be responsible if it results in an injury. Open and obvious means that the defect or hazard was such that a reasonable person would have seen and appreciated the danger presented by the hazard. Likewise, if a person’s own actions contribute to their injury, they will not able to recover from the landowner. 

If you are injured on property owned by another person or business, it is important that you contact an attorney that understands the landowner’s legal responsibilities and the defenses that will be presented.

At Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C., our lawyers are experienced and skilled in pursuing premises liability claims for injured persons. If you have been injured at a business or on another person’s property, we can help.   

Category iconPremises Liability

Super Lawyers Best Lawyers Alabama Association for Justice Best Law Firms The National Trial Lawyers

Footer

Siniard Timberlake and League Logo
  • Disclaimer
  • LawCall
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Recent Posts

  • Health Insurance, Auto Accidents & You
  • Facts on Filing Slip and Fall Lawsuits
  • Car Accident Settlements: Counting the Cost
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2021 Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C. All rights reserved.
Website by Move Digital Group and Active-8 Communications


Although we handle cases throughout Alabama, Tennessee, and Georgia, our primary practice areas are in North Alabama and Southern Tennessee. We serve the following localities: Colbert County including Tuscumbia and Muscle Shoals; DeKalb County including Fort Payne; Etowah County including Gadsden; Jackson County including Scottsboro; Lauderdale County including Florence; Lawrence County including Moulton; Limestone County including Athens; Madison County including Huntsville and Madison; Marshall County including Albertville, Boaz, and Guntersville; and Morgan County including Decatur and Hartselle. In Tennessee we serve Giles County including Pulaski; Lawrence County including Lawrenceburg; Lincoln County including Fayetteville; and Franklin County including Winchester.

No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.